Making trust instant, open and programmable

A research-driven global investment firm since 2018

Our Numbers

Investments
168
Profitable Exits
19
Unicorns
12
Founder Nationalities
33

A note from our founding partners

Founding Partner

Lasse Clausen

Portrait of Lasse Clausen

Founding Partner

Christopher Heymann

Portrait of Christopher Heymann

We founded 1kx in 2018 on a structural claim: trust was about to become contestable, and the largest outcomes in technology would accrue to the networks and companies that compressed its cost.

Eight years, three market cycles, and more than 160 investments later, that claim has held. Decentralized finance, stablecoin payments, and the protocols beneath them produced the outcomes our 2018 thesis predicted. The data has sharpened the framework: Cost of Trust 2.0 names the two mechanisms by which the prize is captured.

What hasn't changed is how we work. We underwrite on fundamentals. We commit across cycles. We partner with founders building configurations that compound: the ones that require a blockchain to exist.

Partner Note

Portrait of Lasse Clausen
Portrait of Christopher Heymann

Founding Partner

LasseClausen

Founding Partner

ChristopherHeymann

We founded 1kx in 2018 on a structural claim: trust was about to become contestable, and the largest outcomes in technology would accrue to the networks and companies that compressed its cost.

Eight years, three market cycles, and more than 160 investments later, that claim has held. Decentralized finance, stablecoin payments, and the protocols beneath them produced the outcomes our 2018 thesis predicted. The data has sharpened the framework: Cost of Trust 2.0 names the two mechanisms by which the prize is captured.

What hasn't changed is how we work. We underwrite on fundamentals. We commit across cycles. We partner with founders building configurations that compound: the ones that require a blockchain to exist.

Investments

Skip portfolio list

Cost of Trust 2.0Flagship thesis, June 2026

Roughly 35% of the US labor market is trust-enabling work: auditors, escrow agents, intermediaries, paperwork.

Blockchain reduces the cost of establishing that trust toward zero.

Cost of Trust 1.0 named the addressable surface. 2.0 names the two mechanisms by which it is captured.

Addressable surface of trustMechanisms that capture it
  1. 01

    Trust-intermediary rent compression

    Replace a paid trust intermediary; compress the rent. A blockchain that delivers the same trust outcome at lower cost makes the intermediary's wage the addressable market.

  2. 02

    Enablement, zero to one

    Make possible what legacy infrastructure cannot produce. Value is captured by serving demand the legacy system structurally cannot serve.

Cost of Trust 2.0Placement map

A thesis-fit deal captures one; the largest outcomes capture both.

Strongest wins

Both mechanisms compound: a real rent is compressed, and the product is one legacy infrastructure cannot produce. Stablecoin payments, DEXs, DeFi lending and the L1 substrate sit here. The larger share of where we deploy.

Hover or tap a quadrant
Cost of Trust placement map: trust-intermediary rent compression across, enablement up; the strongest wins sit top rightEnablement-driven winsStrongest winsBoth mechanismsNon-venture scalePure disintermediation01Trust-intermediary rent compression02Enablement, zero to one

Onchain Revenue DashboardSnapshot September 30, 2026

Onchain revenue, live.

An analytical surface for protocol fees, holder revenue, active protocol breadth and current-quarter market structure.

  • $4.0B+36% QoQ2026-Q3 fees
  • 1,943active protocols · QTD
September 2026

Fees measure user-paid onchain fees. Sources and methodology on the dashboard.

Insights

Research shaping how we underwrite onchain markets.

1kx in the news